Pharmacokinetic monitoring of 24-hour infusion of methotrexate in an adult population with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

To describe the behavior and variability of methotrexate (MTX) pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and to suggest a monitoring system to optimize sample collection using a bayesian method. Two adult patient groups diagnosed with different NHL types were studied. Gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Farmacia hospitalaria 2004-11, Vol.28 (6), p.433
Hauptverfasser: Fernández Megía, M J, Alós Almiñana, M, Esquer Borrás, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To describe the behavior and variability of methotrexate (MTX) pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and to suggest a monitoring system to optimize sample collection using a bayesian method. Two adult patient groups diagnosed with different NHL types were studied. Group I was made up of 9 patients aged 53 +/- 16 years who received MTX at a mean dose of 1.652 +/- 327 mg per course. Group II was made up of 7 patients aged 53 +/- 14 years who received MTX at a mean dose of 1.862 +/- 220 mg per course. No statistically significant differences between groups were seen. Serum MTX measurements were performed using polarized immunofluorescence (TDx system). The pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Abbottbase Pharmacokinetics Systems (PKS) software, adjusting experimental data according to a bicompartmental linear model for intravenous delivery using non-linear regression in Group I and Bayesian estimates in Group II. By estimating mean square error and linear regression between predicted and experimental concentrations, the capability of the Bayesian method implemented in PKS to predict plasma MTX concentration at 48 hours post-infusion was evaluated. The safety of MTX therapy was assessed using patient medical histories and then scoring toxicity using the WHO scale. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for group I included: alpha (h(-1)) = 0.38 +/- 0.12; beta (h(-1)) = 0.07 +/- 0.03; K12 (h(-1)) = 0.02 +/- 0.02; K21 (h(-1)) = 0.09 +/- 0.09; K13 (h(-1)) = 0.34 +/- 0.12; Vc (l/kg) = 0.53 +/- 0.23; Vss (l/kg) = 0.62 +/- 0.26; Cl (l/kg.h) = 0.16 +/- 0.06. The error for the PKS population model in measuring plasma MTX concentration at 48 hours post-infusion in Group II was calculated in accordance with three sampling schemes -12 h, 24 h, and both. It was -14.58 x 10(-3), -15.70 x 10(-3) and -14.67 x 10(-3), respectively. Eqm was 9.58 x 10(-3), 2.39 x 10(-3), and 1.02 x 10(-3), respectively. An MTX monitoring scheme is suggested based on a Bayesian method implementing pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from an adult population with NHL, which allows therapy safety and the clearance profile of MTX to be predicted from a single sample collected at 24 hours post-infusion.
ISSN:1130-6343