Shunting Inhibition in Accessory Optic System Neurons
Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri Submitted 3 March 2004; accepted in final form 17 November 2004 The interaction of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the accessory optic system was studied with whole cell reco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2005-04, Vol.93 (4), p.1959-1969 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
Submitted 3 March 2004;
accepted in final form 17 November 2004
The interaction of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the accessory optic system was studied with whole cell recordings in the turtle basal optic nucleus. Previous studies have shown that visual patterns, drifting in the same preferred direction, evoke excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic events simultaneously. Analysis of the reversal potentials for these events and their pharmacological profile suggest that they are mediated by AMPA and GABA A receptors, respectively. Here, neurons were recorded to study nonlinear interaction between excitatory and inhibitory responses evoked by electrical microstimulation of the retina and pretectum, respectively. The responses to coincident activation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs exhibited membrane shunting in that the excitatory response amplitude, adjusted for changes in driving force, was attenuated during the onset of the inhibitory response. This nonlinear interaction was seen in many but not all stimulus pairings. In some cases, attenuation was followed by an augmentation of the excitatory response. For comparison, the size of the excitatory response was evaluated during a hyperpolarizing current pulse that directly modulated voltage-sensitive channels of a slow rectifying I h current. Injection of hyperpolarizing current did not cause the attenuation of the excitatory synaptic responses. We conclude that there is a nonlinear interaction between these excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents that is not due to hyperpolarization itself, but probably is a result of their own synaptic conductance changes, i.e., shunting. Since these events are evoked by identical visual stimuli, this interaction may play a role in visual processing.
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Ariel, Dept. of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, Saint Louis Univ., 1402 S. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104 (E-mail: ARIELM{at}SLU.EDU ) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
DOI: | 10.1152/jn.00214.2004 |