Open-label study of mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets in depressed patients in the nursing home

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets in depressed, elderly nursing home residents, under naturalistic study conditions. Methods: In this open-label 12-week study, mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets (15-45mg day−1) were admin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current medical research and opinion 2003, Vol.19 (8), p.737-746
Hauptverfasser: Roose, Steven P., Nelson, J. Craig, Salzman, Carl, Hollander, Steven B., Rodrigues, Heidi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets in depressed, elderly nursing home residents, under naturalistic study conditions. Methods: In this open-label 12-week study, mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets (15-45mg day−1) were administered to patients >70 years old with physician-diagnosed depression and a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score >10. Patients with medical comorbidities, cognitive impairment and/or concomitant medications were enrolled if they met study inclusion criteria and had illnesses and/or medication dosages that were considered stable. Assessments were performed at baseline by physicians and at days 14, 28, 56, and 84 (or early termination) by physicians or nurse coordinators using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, the 16-item Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (Ham-D-16 (the standard 17-item scale minus item 14)), and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). Tolerability was evaluated based on treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: A total of 119 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) group were treated with mirtazapine orally disintegrating tablets (mean daily dose: 19.4mg) and evaluated for efficacy. At endpoint, 54% of patients in the ITT group showed CGI-I response (defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 ('very much' or 'much' improved) and 47% were Ham-D-16 responders (defined as decrease from baseline of at least 50% in Ham-D-16 total score). CSDD mean scores and Ham-D-16 mean total scores demonstrated a progressive decrease from baseline to trial completion. The decrease in Ham-D scores from baseline to day 84 was statistically significant (p 
ISSN:0300-7995
1473-4877
DOI:10.1185/030079903125002441