Differential stereospecificities and affinities of folate receptor isoforms for folate compounds and antifolates

Two membrane folate receptor (MFR) isoforms are present in human tissues i.e. MFR-1 (e.g. placenta) and MFR-2 (e.g. placenta, KB cells, CaCo-2 cells). MFR-1 was expressed in COS-1 cells and the resulting protein had the same polypeptide molecular weight as the native protein. The affinities of (6 S)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemical pharmacology 1992-11, Vol.44 (9), p.1898-1901
Hauptverfasser: Xin, Wang, Feng, Shen, Freisheim, James H., Gentry, Larry E., Ratnam, Manohar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two membrane folate receptor (MFR) isoforms are present in human tissues i.e. MFR-1 (e.g. placenta) and MFR-2 (e.g. placenta, KB cells, CaCo-2 cells). MFR-1 was expressed in COS-1 cells and the resulting protein had the same polypeptide molecular weight as the native protein. The affinities of (6 S) and (6 R) diastereoisomers of N 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, N 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, and 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate as well as folic acid and methotrexate to MFR-1, MFR-2 and placental MFR (MFR-1 plus MFR-2) were determined in terms of the K i, values for their competitive inhibition of the binding of [ 3H]folic acid to these proteins. The results indicated a striking difference in the stereospecificity of MFR-1 and MFR-2 for reduced folate coenzymes; MFR-2 preferentially bound to the physiological (6 S) diastereoisomers and MFR-1 bound preferentially to the unphysiological (6 R) diastereoisomers, while dideazatetrahydrofolate did not show significant stereospecificity for MFR-1. Furthermore, MFR-2 displayed significantly (2- to 100-fold) greater affinities for all the compounds tested compared to MFR-1. Purified placental MFR, a natural source of MFR-1 which contains variable amounts of MFR-2, showed intermediate K i values for the compounds tested compared with MFR-1 and MFR-2 and stereospecificities similar to MFR-1. These observations demonstrate striking differences in the ligand binding sites of MFR-1 and MFR-2 which could potentially be exploited in the design of MFR isoform specific antifolates.
ISSN:0006-2952
1873-2968
DOI:10.1016/0006-2952(92)90089-2