Validation of surface recordings of the diaphragm response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans
1 Laboratoire de Physiopathologie Respiratoire, Service de Pneumologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 Unité Propre de Recherche de l'Enseignement Supérieur EA 2397, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, 75013 Paris; and 3 Service de Phys...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2003-02, Vol.94 (2), p.453-461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Laboratoire de Physiopathologie Respiratoire,
Service de Pneumologie, Groupe Hospitalier
Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique,
Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 Unité Propre de
Recherche de l'Enseignement Supérieur EA 2397,
Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI, 75013 Paris; and
3 Service de Physiologie Respiratoire et Sportive,
Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire,
76000 Rouen, France
The integrity of
the central efferent motor pathways to the diaphragm can be assessed by
using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure the latency of the
corresponding motor evoked potentials with surface electrodes. Because
transcranial magnetic stimulation does not activate the diaphragm
alone, signal contamination is a potential problem. To evaluate this
issue, surface diaphragmatic motor-evoked potential latencies were
compared with latencies recorded from diaphragm needle in 9 healthy
volunteers. Surface latencies of muscles likely to contaminate the
diaphragm signals (serratus anterior, pectoralis major, and tranversus
abdominis) were also recorded. The latencies in response to nonfocal
transcranial stimulation from surface electrodes were not significantly
different from the needle ones (17 ± 1.3 vs. 17.2 ± 1.1 ms,
respectively) but were significantly different from the latencies of
the other muscles. In two cases, signal contamination appeared likely
(serratus anterior in 1 case, abdominal muscles in 1 case). It is
possible to reliably measure the latency of the diaphragm response to
transcranial magnetic stimulation with adequately positioned surface electrodes.
cerebral cortex |
---|---|
ISSN: | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
DOI: | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00581.2002 |