Limb congestion enhances the synchronization of sympathetic outflow with muscle contraction

1  Division of Cardiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033; and 2  Lebanon Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lebanon, Pennsylvania 17042 In this report, we examined if the synchronization of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2000-08, Vol.279 (2), p.478-R483
Hauptverfasser: Mostoufi-Moab, Sogol, Herr, Michael D, Silber, David H, Gray, Kristen S, Leuenberger, Urs A, Sinoway, Lawrence I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1  Division of Cardiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033; and 2  Lebanon Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lebanon, Pennsylvania 17042 In this report, we examined if the synchronization of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) with muscle contraction is enhanced by limb congestion. To explore this relationship, we applied signal-averaging techniques to the MSNA signal obtained during short bouts of forearm contraction (2-s contraction/3-s rest cycle) at 40% maximal voluntary contraction for 5 min. We performed this analysis before and after forearm venous congestion; an intervention that augments the autonomic response to sustained static muscle contractions via a local effect on muscle afferents. There was an increased percentage of the MSNA noted during second 2  of the 5-s contraction/rest cycles. The percentage of total MSNA seen during this particular second increased from minute 1  to 5  of contraction and was increased further by limb congestion (control minute 1  = 25.6 ± 2.0%, minute 5  = 32.8 ± 2.2%; limb congestion minute 1  = 29.3 ± 2.1%, minute 5  = 37.8 ± 3.9%; exercise main effect
ISSN:0363-6119
1522-1490
DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.2.R478