Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after treatment of retinoblastoma

Purpose: To determine the rate of retinal detachment after treatment of retinoblastoma, to describe the clinical features and management, and to discuss possible pathogenic mechanisms. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 80 patients (83 eyes) with retinoblastoma treated conservatively...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic genetics 1999, Vol.20 (3), p.141-151
Hauptverfasser: Bovey, Etienne H., Fernandez-Ragaz, Ana, Héon, Elise, Balmer, Aubin, Munier, Francis L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To determine the rate of retinal detachment after treatment of retinoblastoma, to describe the clinical features and management, and to discuss possible pathogenic mechanisms. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 80 patients (83 eyes) with retinoblastoma treated conservatively between 1963 and 1994, looking specifically for cases that developed a retinal detachment after treatment. Results: Five patients (5 eyes, stages IVa to Vb) developed a retinal detachment after treatment. Of these, four had undergone external radiotherapy and one had an episcleral cobalt plaque. Retinal detachment developed within three months after radiotherapy and relentlessly progressed in all four eyes over a period of five months to four years. In the eye that received the episcleral cobalt plaque, the detachment remained localized inferiorly. Even though no retinal break could be detected in four eyes, the clinical features were suggestive of a rhegmatogenous detachment: there was retinal thinning adjacent to the regressed tumors, and the evolution was much longer than that of an exudative retinal detachment. A scleral buckling procedure was performed in two eyes and the retina was successfully reattached. The retinal detachment was not operated on in the three other eyes: the hole was too posterior in one eye; retinal surgery was refused in the second eye; and the retinal detachment remained localized inferiorly in the third eye. Conclusion: A retinal detachment developed in 6% of eyes after conservative treatment of retinoblastoma. The possibility of a rhegmatogenous origin should be considered even if no retinal break is detected. In the absence of tumor activity, a scleral buckling repair could be carefully considered if the retinal detachment threatens the macula, and if its evolution is not indicative of an exudative detachment.
ISSN:1381-6810
1744-5094
DOI:10.1076/opge.20.3.141.2283