Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams

In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber diffe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213
Hauptverfasser: Reft, Chester S., Kuchnir, Franca T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 208
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 26
creator Reft, Chester S.
Kuchnir, Franca T.
description In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.598506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10076976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP8506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p916-379ed55017a2108a1955100242275c15be04d28a34ecb8cc6c265f30ae0cfc383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QTID0DK2o6d5Igq_qRWcOg92jgbGkiayHaB8vSkCkicRtr9ZrUzjF0KmAsh0hsx11mqwRyxqYwTFcUSsmM2BcjiSMagJ-zM-zcAMErDKZsIgMRkiZmy9xWh3zkqefdBDpuG9-TCzhUY6m7LK7Shc55j4CX1YeP5qyMM5HjY4JaXLX7xqnN8YOvv0WI32BY0eOotp4ZscMOwIGz9OTupsPF08asztr6_Wy8eo-Xzw9Pidhn1mTCRSjIqtQaRoBSQosi0Hv6VsZSJtkIXBHEpU1Qx2SK11lhpdKUACWxlVapm7Go82--Klsq8d3WLbp__hR6A6xH4rBva_9vnhzJzkY9l5quXg6gf6T1mVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><description>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10076976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Calibration ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; electron beam applications ; electron beam dosimetry ; Electron beams ; electron detection ; Electrons ; Energy Transfer ; Gamma Cameras ; Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters ; ionisation chambers ; ionization chambers ; overall perturbation factor ; Particle Accelerators ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Physicists ; Radiation Dosage ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213</ispartof><rights>1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598506$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10076976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>electron beam applications</subject><subject>electron beam dosimetry</subject><subject>Electron beams</subject><subject>electron detection</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Gamma Cameras</subject><subject>Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters</subject><subject>ionisation chambers</subject><subject>ionization chambers</subject><subject>overall perturbation factor</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QTID0DK2o6d5Igq_qRWcOg92jgbGkiayHaB8vSkCkicRtr9ZrUzjF0KmAsh0hsx11mqwRyxqYwTFcUSsmM2BcjiSMagJ-zM-zcAMErDKZsIgMRkiZmy9xWh3zkqefdBDpuG9-TCzhUY6m7LK7Shc55j4CX1YeP5qyMM5HjY4JaXLX7xqnN8YOvv0WI32BY0eOotp4ZscMOwIGz9OTupsPF08asztr6_Wy8eo-Xzw9Pidhn1mTCRSjIqtQaRoBSQosi0Hv6VsZSJtkIXBHEpU1Qx2SK11lhpdKUACWxlVapm7Go82--Klsq8d3WLbp__hR6A6xH4rBva_9vnhzJzkY9l5quXg6gf6T1mVQ</recordid><startdate>199902</startdate><enddate>199902</enddate><creator>Reft, Chester S.</creator><creator>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199902</creationdate><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><author>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p916-379ed55017a2108a1955100242275c15be04d28a34ecb8cc6c265f30ae0cfc383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>electron beam applications</topic><topic>electron beam dosimetry</topic><topic>Electron beams</topic><topic>electron detection</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Gamma Cameras</topic><topic>Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters</topic><topic>ionisation chambers</topic><topic>ionization chambers</topic><topic>overall perturbation factor</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reft, Chester S.</au><au>Kuchnir, Franca T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1999-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>208-213</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>10076976</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598506</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_10076976
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Calibration
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
electron beam applications
electron beam dosimetry
Electron beams
electron detection
Electrons
Energy Transfer
Gamma Cameras
Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters
ionisation chambers
ionization chambers
overall perturbation factor
Particle Accelerators
Phantoms, Imaging
Physicists
Radiation Dosage
radiation therapy
Radiation therapy equipment
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
title Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measured%20overall%20perturbation%20factors%20at%20depths%20greater%20than%20dmax%20for%20ionization%20chambers%20in%20electron%20beams&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Reft,%20Chester%20S.&rft.date=1999-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=208-213&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598506&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EMP8506%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10076976&rfr_iscdi=true