Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams
In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber diffe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 208 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Reft, Chester S. Kuchnir, Franca T. |
description | In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.598506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_10076976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP8506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p916-379ed55017a2108a1955100242275c15be04d28a34ecb8cc6c265f30ae0cfc383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QTID0DK2o6d5Igq_qRWcOg92jgbGkiayHaB8vSkCkicRtr9ZrUzjF0KmAsh0hsx11mqwRyxqYwTFcUSsmM2BcjiSMagJ-zM-zcAMErDKZsIgMRkiZmy9xWh3zkqefdBDpuG9-TCzhUY6m7LK7Shc55j4CX1YeP5qyMM5HjY4JaXLX7xqnN8YOvv0WI32BY0eOotp4ZscMOwIGz9OTupsPF08asztr6_Wy8eo-Xzw9Pidhn1mTCRSjIqtQaRoBSQosi0Hv6VsZSJtkIXBHEpU1Qx2SK11lhpdKUACWxlVapm7Go82--Klsq8d3WLbp__hR6A6xH4rBva_9vnhzJzkY9l5quXg6gf6T1mVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><description>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10076976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Calibration ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; electron beam applications ; electron beam dosimetry ; Electron beams ; electron detection ; Electrons ; Energy Transfer ; Gamma Cameras ; Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters ; ionisation chambers ; ionization chambers ; overall perturbation factor ; Particle Accelerators ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Physicists ; Radiation Dosage ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213</ispartof><rights>1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598506$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10076976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>electron beam applications</subject><subject>electron beam dosimetry</subject><subject>Electron beams</subject><subject>electron detection</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Gamma Cameras</subject><subject>Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters</subject><subject>ionisation chambers</subject><subject>ionization chambers</subject><subject>overall perturbation factor</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EoqUg8QTID0DK2o6d5Igq_qRWcOg92jgbGkiayHaB8vSkCkicRtr9ZrUzjF0KmAsh0hsx11mqwRyxqYwTFcUSsmM2BcjiSMagJ-zM-zcAMErDKZsIgMRkiZmy9xWh3zkqefdBDpuG9-TCzhUY6m7LK7Shc55j4CX1YeP5qyMM5HjY4JaXLX7xqnN8YOvv0WI32BY0eOotp4ZscMOwIGz9OTupsPF08asztr6_Wy8eo-Xzw9Pidhn1mTCRSjIqtQaRoBSQosi0Hv6VsZSJtkIXBHEpU1Qx2SK11lhpdKUACWxlVapm7Go82--Klsq8d3WLbp__hR6A6xH4rBva_9vnhzJzkY9l5quXg6gf6T1mVQ</recordid><startdate>199902</startdate><enddate>199902</enddate><creator>Reft, Chester S.</creator><creator>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199902</creationdate><title>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</title><author>Reft, Chester S. ; Kuchnir, Franca T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p916-379ed55017a2108a1955100242275c15be04d28a34ecb8cc6c265f30ae0cfc383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>electron beam applications</topic><topic>electron beam dosimetry</topic><topic>Electron beams</topic><topic>electron detection</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Gamma Cameras</topic><topic>Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters</topic><topic>ionisation chambers</topic><topic>ionization chambers</topic><topic>overall perturbation factor</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reft, Chester S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchnir, Franca T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reft, Chester S.</au><au>Kuchnir, Franca T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1999-02</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>208-213</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>In electron beam dosimetry the perturbation effect in the medium by the ionization chamber cavity is accounted for by introducing a replacement correction factor, Prepl. Another perturbation correction factor, denoted as Pwall, is due to the materials of the walls of the parallel‐plate chamber differing from the phantom material. Because of the difficulties in separating these two components, we measure the overall perturbation factor, pq=PreplPwall. A distinct advantage of parallel‐plate ionization chambers over cylindrical chambers is that pq has been shown to be close to unity at the standard calibration depth, dmax. However, for many dosimetry applications it is necessary to know the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax. We measured the overall perturbation factor at depths greater than dmax (approximating the 95%, 90% and 50% depth dose) for a Farmer‐type cylindrical ionization chamber and three parallel‐plate ionization chambers. We assumed that pq for the NACP chamber is unity at these measurement depths. The depth dependence for the other chambers was then measured relative to the NACP chamber. The mean energy at depth, Ed, and percentage depth dose gradient ranges studied were 1.9–18.5 MeV and 0 to 4.5%/mm, respectively. For the other two parallel‐plate chambers, we find pq to be unity at depths where the percent depth dose is greater than 90%, but it deviates from unity at deeper depths, where the dose gradients exceed about 2.5%/mm. For the cylindrical chamber, pq values at depths greater than dmax were found to be in good agreement with those in TG 21, where the energy at depth, Ed, is used to evaluate pq.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>10076976</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598506</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 1999-02, Vol.26 (2), p.208-213 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_10076976 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Calibration dosimetry Dosimetry/exposure assessment electron beam applications electron beam dosimetry Electron beams electron detection Electrons Energy Transfer Gamma Cameras Gas‐filled counters: ionization chambers, proportional, and avalanche counters ionisation chambers ionization chambers overall perturbation factor Particle Accelerators Phantoms, Imaging Physicists Radiation Dosage radiation therapy Radiation therapy equipment Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted |
title | Measured overall perturbation factors at depths greater than dmax for ionization chambers in electron beams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measured%20overall%20perturbation%20factors%20at%20depths%20greater%20than%20dmax%20for%20ionization%20chambers%20in%20electron%20beams&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Reft,%20Chester%20S.&rft.date=1999-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=208-213&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598506&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EMP8506%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10076976&rfr_iscdi=true |