Degradation Products of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Aqueous Solution

The thermal and peroxide-catalyzed degradation products of mycophenolate mofetil (1) were studied in aqueous solution at pH 2.0, 3.5, 6.0, and 8.2. The major thermal degradation product observed was mycophenolic acid (2). At pH 6.0 and 8.2, 2 was the only product observed in the absence of peroxide,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug development and industrial pharmacy 1999-01, Vol.25 (3), p.361-365
Hauptverfasser: Hooijmaaijer, Elvira, Brandl, Michael, Nelson, Janis, Lustig, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The thermal and peroxide-catalyzed degradation products of mycophenolate mofetil (1) were studied in aqueous solution at pH 2.0, 3.5, 6.0, and 8.2. The major thermal degradation product observed was mycophenolic acid (2). At pH 6.0 and 8.2, 2 was the only product observed in the absence of peroxide, while at pH 2.0 and 3.5, the lactone analogue of mycophenolic acid (5), a hydroxylactone due to oxygenation of the double bond (6), and an unidentified product were formed. Compound 6 degraded to 4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-7-methyl-3-oxo-1,3-dihydro-isobenzofuran-5-carbaldehyde (9) on prolonged storage and was present in the sample stressed at pH 2. Mycophenolic acid (2), the N-oxide of mycophenolate mofetil (3), the hydroxylactone of mycophenolic acid (6), and the erythro form of 4-methoxy-5-methyl- 2-(2-methyl-5-oxo-tetrahydro-furan-2-yl)-3,6-dihydro-2H-1,7-dioxa-as-indacen-8- one (8) were observed in the presence of hydrogen peroxide at pH 3.5, 6.0, and 8.2. In addition, at pH 8.2, 4-hydroxy-4-(4-methoxy-5-methyl-8-oxo-2,3,6,8-tetrahydro-1,7-dioxa-as-indacen-2-yl)-pentanoic acid (7) was seen. Peroxide-stressed samples at pH 2.0 gave no major degradation peaks, but a small amount of the hydroxylactone of mycophenolic acid (6) was formed.
ISSN:0363-9045
1520-5762
DOI:10.1081/DDC-100102183