CAN THE CONTINUOUS BREACH THEORY SAVE YOUR TIME-BARRED COMPLAINT?
Suit was brought in federal court, which then referred a certified question to the South Carolina Supreme Court to resolve whether the state recognized the continuous breach theory. The Court cited an example of a construction contract; if a contractor applied the wrong color paint to the bathrooms...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Commercial Law World 2022-10, Vol.36 (4), p.34-0_2 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Suit was brought in federal court, which then referred a certified question to the South Carolina Supreme Court to resolve whether the state recognized the continuous breach theory. The Court cited an example of a construction contract; if a contractor applied the wrong color paint to the bathrooms in a construction project, the failure to bring suit for that breach would not prevent the owner from pursuing a claim if the roof caved in five years later. The Court did state that the determination whether the subsequent breaches could be deemed a new obligation is a matter of contract law, and as with any contract, the court must first look to the terms of the contract and enforce the terms between the parties. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0888-8000 |