CAN THE CONTINUOUS BREACH THEORY SAVE YOUR TIME-BARRED COMPLAINT?

Suit was brought in federal court, which then referred a certified question to the South Carolina Supreme Court to resolve whether the state recognized the continuous breach theory. The Court cited an example of a construction contract; if a contractor applied the wrong color paint to the bathrooms...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Commercial Law World 2022-10, Vol.36 (4), p.34-0_2
1. Verfasser: Bernstein, Robert A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Suit was brought in federal court, which then referred a certified question to the South Carolina Supreme Court to resolve whether the state recognized the continuous breach theory. The Court cited an example of a construction contract; if a contractor applied the wrong color paint to the bathrooms in a construction project, the failure to bring suit for that breach would not prevent the owner from pursuing a claim if the roof caved in five years later. The Court did state that the determination whether the subsequent breaches could be deemed a new obligation is a matter of contract law, and as with any contract, the court must first look to the terms of the contract and enforce the terms between the parties.
ISSN:0888-8000