Proposed bills would limit specific landowners' rights

[...]the state Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the state's constitution prohibits the taking of private property from one person and giving it to other private parties for their private use. [...]the court invalidated the right of first refusal law. [...]the law didn't impose a no-sale wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Business 2023-02, Vol.38 (4), p.8-8
1. Verfasser: Cochran, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[...]the state Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the state's constitution prohibits the taking of private property from one person and giving it to other private parties for their private use. [...]the court invalidated the right of first refusal law. [...]the law didn't impose a no-sale waiting period. Since 2017, more and more penalties have been added for landowners not following their notice requirements and proposed no-sale waiting periods. If they are allowed to make a land-taking law for manufactured housing, there's precedent for going after other residential or business property in the name of a vague "public benefit."
ISSN:1075-6124