Defining the Scope of Federal Preemption: State Farm, Exclusive Agents, and Other Emerging Issues

The courts and the federal bank regulatory agencies have recognized that federal law broadly preempts state law with respect to the lending activities of federal savings associations, national banks, and the operating subsidiaries of both. In October 2004, the Office of Thrift Supervision issued an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Business Lawyer 2009-02, Vol.64 (2), p.605-615
Hauptverfasser: Tomkies, Michael C., Wutscher, Ralph T., Beam, David L., Anstaett, Elizabeth L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The courts and the federal bank regulatory agencies have recognized that federal law broadly preempts state law with respect to the lending activities of federal savings associations, national banks, and the operating subsidiaries of both. In October 2004, the Office of Thrift Supervision issued an interpretive letter concluding that state licensing and registration requirements that do not apply to a federal savings bank also do not apply to qualifying agents where the agents perform marketing, solicitation, and customer service activities related to the bank's deposit and loan products and services and other authorized banking powers. In the context of refund anticipation loans, one court found that state law restrictions on agents that indirectly restrict national banks or their operating subsidiaries are preempted. As the scope of federal preemption has become more defined, plaintiffs have sometimes succeeded in avoiding preemption challenges by basing claims on unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentation, and similar theories.
ISSN:0007-6899
2164-1838