What's Mine Is . . . Mine
For years, data had a home. It resided in an application on the network, and a particular group of people authorized to access that application controlled how the data was handled. But as information-sharing initiatives begin to take shape in government, data becomes more transient. And that leaves...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Government Executive 2008-10, Vol.40 (14), p.59 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | For years, data had a home. It resided in an application on the network, and a particular group of people authorized to access that application controlled how the data was handled. But as information-sharing initiatives begin to take shape in government, data becomes more transient. And that leaves many feeling uncomfortable. Most discussions about information sharing revert to security -- how to ensure the protection and integrity of data as it travels across networks. But actually, culture could trump security in terms of difficulty. To get naysayers on board -- or at least cooperating -- they must be included in the discussion, says John Teeter, chief enterprise architect at the Health and Human Services Department. A more open dialogue helps foster relationships, which is another key factor in encouraging information exchange. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-2626 2152-6702 |