The governor versus the adjutant general: the case of Major General George O. Pearson, Wyoming National Guard

"2 What follows is the story of the legal fight between the Governor of Wyoming and the highest military official of that state; a conflict that resulted in a Wyoming Supreme Court decision and Pearson's court- martial, a unique event in the history of the Army National Guard and military...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Army Lawyer 2014-03, p.59
1. Verfasser: Borch, Fred L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:"2 What follows is the story of the legal fight between the Governor of Wyoming and the highest military official of that state; a conflict that resulted in a Wyoming Supreme Court decision and Pearson's court- martial, a unique event in the history of the Army National Guard and military criminal law. [...]the Court held that "the Governor exceeded his powers" in removing Pearson from office and granted summary judgment for him on the complaint.11 So what was Governor Hansen to do? Since the highest court of the state had indicated in its opinion that there was no reason that the governor could not convene a court- martial to hear the evidence against Major General Pearson, Hansen took action.
ISSN:0364-1287
1554-9011