The Image World Is Flat
In 2008 Patrick Cariou brought a copyright infringement suit against Richard Prince. Prince had used images of Rastafarians photographed by Carlou and published in a photobook to create a series of collage paintings. At the trial level, Prince's use of Cariou's images was ruled infringing,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aperture 2013-04 (210), p.70 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In 2008 Patrick Cariou brought a copyright infringement suit against Richard Prince. Prince had used images of Rastafarians photographed by Carlou and published in a photobook to create a series of collage paintings. At the trial level, Prince's use of Cariou's images was ruled infringing, and the case is now on appeal. Debates around appropriation raise a number of questions regarding creative freedom, fair use, and transformative versus derivative borrowing. However, a less examined aspect of legal cases involving art is the role played by visual evidence. Here artist Penelope Umbrico, known for her work with images sourced from various print and online contexts, speaks with art historian and intellectual-property lawyer Virginia Rutledge about the use of reproductions in our increasingly flattened image world. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-6420 |