Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a District General Hospital

Background The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple tool for intraoperative risk stratification. The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess its performance in predicting outcome after general/vascular and orthopedic surgery and its utility in a U.K. district general hospital. Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2012-05, Vol.36 (5), p.1066-1073
Hauptverfasser: Thorn, Christopher C., Chan, Melanie, Sinha, Nihal, Harrison, Richard A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple tool for intraoperative risk stratification. The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess its performance in predicting outcome after general/vascular and orthopedic surgery and its utility in a U.K. district general hospital. Method A prospective cohort of 223 consecutive general, vascular, and orthopedic surgical cases was studied. The SAS was calculated for all patients, and its relationship to 30 day mortality and major complication assessed with reference to the mode of surgery (elective or emergent). Statistical analysis of categorical data was performed with Fisher’s exact test and the AUC (area under the curve) on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Selected cases were reviewed to assess the potential of the SAS to modify postoperative management. Results The proportion of patients who died or experienced major complications increased monotonically with Surgical Apgar Score category in general and vascular but not orthopedic cases. The relative risks of mortality or major complication between SAS categories were less marked than in previous publications. The SAS performed variably on ROC curve analysis, with an AUC of 0.62–0.73. Discrimination achieved significance in general and vascular cases ( p  = 0.0002) but not in orthopedic cases ( p  = 0.15). Subgroup analysis of high (SAS 
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1495-2