The size of the bile duct by echograph. A study

The purpose of this work was to determine the size of the bile duct by echograph. The frequent injuries of the bile duct in various pathologies in particular infection, made of it a very investigated organ especially by echograph. Its size can be modified by various pathologies. So it is of interest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Morphologie 2012-03, Vol.96 (312), p.7-11
Hauptverfasser: Ongoïba, N, Sissoko, F, Ouologuem, I, Bérété, S, Diop, A K T, Sidibé, S, Touré, M, Kéita, A D, Koumaré, A K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this work was to determine the size of the bile duct by echograph. The frequent injuries of the bile duct in various pathologies in particular infection, made of it a very investigated organ especially by echograph. Its size can be modified by various pathologies. So it is of interest to know about its normal size. Sixty normal subjects, among which 29 women, were examined by echograph in the university hospital of the Point G. They were voluntary subjects with an empty stomach for 12 hours. Three different sonographers successively performed this examination according to the same protocol with an Aloka SSD 1700 device type and a Kontron Medical/Imagic Maestro. These devices were provided with a convex probe of 3.5-megahertz multifrequency and with a linear probe of 7.5-megahertz. The subjects were in dorsal position. Reference points for the display of the bile duct were the liver, the gallbladder and the pancreas. The limits of the bile duct were marked by the cursor of the echograph. The transverse diameter (in mm) of the bile duct was measured in its origin and in its ending. No subject of the sample was obese enough to hamper the visibility of the gall-bladder and the bile duct and no subject had histories of cholecystectomy. Data analysis was made using the software Ear information version 6. The difference between variables was considered as significant when P
ISSN:1286-0115
DOI:10.1016/j.morpho.2012.01.003