Efficient Transit Schedule Design of timing points: A comparison of Ant Colony and Genetic Algorithms

► Transit Schedule Design as identifying timing points and their slack times. ► Ant Colony and Genetic Algorithms are developed and compared. ► The Ant Colony procedure demonstrates a faster convergence to a ‘good’ solution. This work defines Transit Schedule Design (TSD) as an optimization problem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2012, Vol.46 (1), p.217-234
Hauptverfasser: Mazloumi, Ehsan, Mesbah, Mahmoud, Ceder, Avi, Moridpour, Sara, Currie, Graham
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Transit Schedule Design as identifying timing points and their slack times. ► Ant Colony and Genetic Algorithms are developed and compared. ► The Ant Colony procedure demonstrates a faster convergence to a ‘good’ solution. This work defines Transit Schedule Design (TSD) as an optimization problem to construct the transit schedule with the decision variables of the location of timing points and the amount of slack time associated with each timing point. Two heuristic procedures, Ant Colony and Genetic Algorithms, are developed for constructing optimal schedules for a fixed bus route. The paper presents a comparison of the fundamental features of the two algorithms. They are then calibrated based on data generated from micro-simulation of a bus route in Melbourne, Australia, to give rise to (near) optimal schedule designs. The algorithms are compared in terms of their accuracy and efficiency in providing the minimum cost solution. Although both procedures prove the ability to find the optimal solution, the Ant Colony procedure demonstrates a higher efficiency by evaluating less schedule designs to arrive at a ‘good’ solution. Potential benefits of the developed algorithms in bus route planning are also discussed.
ISSN:0191-2615
1879-2367
DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2011.09.010