A methodology for joint optimization for maintenance planning, process quality and production scheduling
► Integration of preventive maintenance, quality control and production scheduling. ► Provided a new way of considering the machine and process failures. ► A comparison between integrated model and independent model is made. ► Effect of cost and process parameters has also been investigated. ► Subst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers & industrial engineering 2011-11, Vol.61 (4), p.1098-1106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► Integration of preventive maintenance, quality control and production scheduling. ► Provided a new way of considering the machine and process failures. ► A comparison between integrated model and independent model is made. ► Effect of cost and process parameters has also been investigated. ► Substantial economic benefits are seen in the joint optimization.
Performance of a manufacturing system depends significantly on the shop floor performance. Traditionally, shop floor operational policies concerning maintenance scheduling, quality control and production scheduling have been considered and optimized independently. However, these three aspects of operations planning do have an interaction effect on each other and hence need to be considered jointly for improving the system performance. In this paper, a model is developed for joint optimization of these three aspects in a manufacturing system. First, a model has been developed for integrating maintenance scheduling and process quality control policy decisions. It provided an optimal preventive maintenance interval and control chart parameters that minimize expected cost per unit time. Subsequently, the optimal preventive maintenance interval is integrated with the production schedule in order to determine the optimal batch sequence that will minimize penalty-cost incurred due to schedule delay. An example is presented to illustrate the proposed model. It also compares the system performance employing the proposed integrated approach with that obtained by considering maintenance, quality and production scheduling independently. Substantial economic benefits are seen in the joint optimization. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-8352 1879-0550 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cie.2011.06.023 |