Exercise Oscillatory Breathing and NT-proBNP Levels in Stable Heart Failure Provide the Strongest Prediction of Cardiac Outcome When Combining Biomarkers With Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Abstract Background N-Terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)–derived variables are gold standards for assessing prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. We sought to refine cardiac events prediction by performing a combined analysis of NT-proB...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac failure 2012-04, Vol.18 (4), p.313-320
Hauptverfasser: Guazzi, Marco, MD, PhD, FACC, Boracchi, Patrizia, PhD, Labate, Valentina, MD, Arena, Ross, PhD, FAHA, Reina, Giuseppe, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background N-Terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)–derived variables are gold standards for assessing prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. We sought to refine cardiac events prediction by performing a combined analysis of NT-proBNP with markers of exercise ventilatory efficiency. Methods and Results A total of 260 stable HF patients underwent measurements of plasma NT-proBNP levels before, at peak exercise, and at 1-minute CPET recovery phase along with peak oxygen uptake (VO2 ), ventilation to CO2 production (VE/VCO2 ) slope, and exercise periodic breathing (EPB) determinations. After a median follow-up period of 20.6 months, there were 54 cardiac-related deaths. Univariate analysis including NT-proBNP at rest, at peak exercise, and at 1 minute recovery, peak VO2 , VE/VCO2 slope, and EPB showed NT-proBNP to be the strongest independent predictor with equivalent performance for rest, peak, and recovery levels. Thus, only NT-proBNP at rest was considered (Harrel C 0.783, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.722–0.844) with VE/VCO2 slope (Harrel C 0.720, 95% CI 0.646–0.794), EPB (Harrel C 0.685, 95% CI 0.619–0.751), and peak VO2 (Harrel C 0.618, 95% CI 0.533–0.704). With bivariate stepwise analyses, NT-proBNP along with EPB emerged as the strongest prognosticators (Harrel C 0.800, 95% CI 0.737–0.862). Conclusions In the refinement for robust outcome predictors in HF patients, NT-proBNP levels together with EPB led to the most powerful definition. VE/VCO2 slope and peak VO2 did not provide any prognostic adjunct. A biomarker/CPET approach seems very promising to warrant the continuous implementation in the prognostic work-up of HF patients.
ISSN:1071-9164
1532-8414
DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.006