Unprotected carotid artery stenting: complications in 6 months follow-up

Introduction The most serious complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS) are related to the release of particles into the cerebral circulation. Although embolic protection devices may reduce the incidence of cerebral embolization, their use may be associated with additional complications includi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroradiology 2012-03, Vol.54 (3), p.225-230
Hauptverfasser: Mohammadian, Reza, Sohrabi, Bahram, Mansourizadeh, Reza, Mohammadian, Farideh, Nasiri, Babak, Haririan, Sajad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The most serious complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS) are related to the release of particles into the cerebral circulation. Although embolic protection devices may reduce the incidence of cerebral embolization, their use may be associated with additional complications including spasm or dissection. In this report, we present our experience with patients who underwent unprotected CAS. Methods We prospectively enrolled patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis from October 2008 to June 2010.Stenosis diagnosed based on carotid duplex and/or CT angiography findings and confirmed by digital subtraction angiography. All stenting procedures were done without using a protection device. Neurologist evaluated neurological situation of the patients, 24 h, 30 days, 3 and 6 months after stenting. Patients had carotid duplex scan scheduled on the third and sixth month after the procedure. Results Overall, 116patients underwent stenting; technical success rate was 100% .Mean age of patients was 68.48 ± 9.84 years, and 69% of the patients were male. One patient (1/116, 0.86%) developed transient ischemic attack during the procedure. One non-neurologic death (1/116, 0.86%) occurred 18 h after the procedure because of myocardial infarction. In 1-month follow-up, only one patient (1/115, 0.87%) presented with neurological complication as a consequence of thalamic hemorrhagic. Six months follow-up revealed two cases (2/115, 1.74%) with in-stent restenosis which one of them was severe and symptomatic and underwent angioplasty. Conclusion Unprotected carotid stenting appears to accompany with low early and late complications. Cerebral embolization during CAS is not the only cause of these complications and the use of cerebral protection devices may therefore not prevent all major complications including myocardial infarction, hyperperfusion syndrome, and re-stenosis.
ISSN:0028-3940
1432-1920
DOI:10.1007/s00234-011-0867-x