Removal of nitrate from groundwater using the technology of electrodialysis and electrodeionization

In this paper, the technical capabilities of a lab-scale electrodeionization (EDI) process and its basic technology electrodialysis (ED) process that used for removing NO3– from nitrate-contaminated groundwater were investigated. The EDI unit with three chambers (anode, diluted and cathode) was used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Desalination and water treatment 2011-10, Vol.34 (1-3), p.394-401
Hauptverfasser: Bi, Jingjing, Peng, Changsheng, Xu, Huizhen, Ahmed, Abou-Shady
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, the technical capabilities of a lab-scale electrodeionization (EDI) process and its basic technology electrodialysis (ED) process that used for removing NO3– from nitrate-contaminated groundwater were investigated. The EDI unit with three chambers (anode, diluted and cathode) was used; it utilized electricity to regenerate ion-exchange resins instead of chemicals. At first, the voltage-current (V-I) characteristic curves about the ED and EDI processes were studied, and then chose the optimum operating voltage which based on the curves. The effects of operational parameters (voltage, water flow rate and initial NO3–-N concentration) on nitrate removal rate and concentration effect of ED and different ion-exchange resins, the proportion of anion and cation resins and the voltage used for regeneration of EDI were investigated. The results of ED showed that NO3–-N concentration could be reduced from initial 50–300 mg/l to 1–6 mg/l, with the removal rate 99% and the conductivity could be reduced to less than 10 µs/ cm. Under the conditions of equal (1–8 l/h) and unequal (1:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 l/h) water flow rate between concentrated and diluted water, the concentrated water could be reached to 2–5 times more than the initial water. The current efficiency and energy consumption was 17–34% and – 0.–1.7 W•h/l, respectively. It was shown that ED was effective to NO3 removal and concentration. As to EDI process, the results showed that continuous electrodeionization could regenerate the resins effectively from simulated nitrate-contaminated water. Under the condition of 50 V as the regenerate voltage, after 90 h, the regeneration rate was as high as 60%. In addition, the NO3–-N concentration of the diluted water was reduced to 5 mg/l from initial 50 mg/l. As a fundamental technology of in-situ remediation for groundwater contamination, the process was proved to be feasible and provided foundation for further research.
ISSN:1944-3986
1944-3994
1944-3986
DOI:10.5004/dwt.2011.2891