Farm survey used to guide estimates of nitrogen intake and ammonia emissions for beef cattle, including early season grazing and piosphere effects
National inventories of N emissions to the atmosphere from cattle depend on reliable information about husbandry practices, with appropriate spatial and temporal resolution. A survey of ∼1400 beef cattle farmers was used to quantify the prevalence of pasture and forage management practices that impa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal feed science and technology 2011-06, Vol.166-167, p.688-698 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | National inventories of N emissions to the atmosphere from cattle depend on reliable information about husbandry practices, with appropriate spatial and temporal resolution. A survey of ∼1400 beef cattle farmers was used to quantify the prevalence of pasture and forage management practices that impact N intake and NH3 emissions, with implications for N2O emissions. These survey data were coupled to a mass balance model to inventory NH3 emissions by accounting for total ammoniacal (i.e., ammonia and ammonium) N (TAN) from excretion through to land spreading. As inputs, the model required excretion fractions, 2006 Canadian Census of Agriculture animal populations and detailed farm management practices from the survey. The N intake by grazing cattle was especially difficult to quantify. Early season grazing, when forages have elevated crude protein (>300gCP/kgdry matter), indicated potential for elevated emissions in May and June. Such exceptional CP concentrations during spring grazing may be important for N emissions, especially NH3. Additionally, beef cattle were reported by producers to spend 7–30%) of their time congregated, such as around water sources, feed or shade trees. This level of piosphere activity was attributed in the model to ∼20% increases in NH3 emissions relative to open pasture, and similar or higher effects would be expected for N2O emissions.
This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture–Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors: K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0377-8401 1873-2216 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.048 |