Design and analysis of biorefineries based on raw glycerol: Addressing the glycerol problem
► We have modeled the production of nine added-value products from glycerol. ► We consider chemical and biochemical routes under different production scenarios. ► We present a first design approach to build a system of biorefineries based on crude glycerol. ► We conclude the more profitable added-va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource technology 2012-05, Vol.111, p.282-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► We have modeled the production of nine added-value products from glycerol. ► We consider chemical and biochemical routes under different production scenarios. ► We present a first design approach to build a system of biorefineries based on crude glycerol. ► We conclude the more profitable added-value products from glycerol are 1,2 and 1,3 propanediols.
Glycerol as a low-cost by-product of the biodiesel industry can be considered a renewable building block for biorefineries. In this work, the conversion of raw glycerol to nine added-value products obtained by chemical (syn-gas, acrolein, and 1,2-propanediol) or bio-chemical (ethanol, 1,3-propanediol, d-lactic acid, succinic acid, propionic acid, and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate) routes were considered. The technological schemes for these synthesis routes were designed, simulated, and economically assessed using Aspen Plus and Aspen Icarus Process Evaluator, respectively. The techno-economic potential of a glycerol-based biorefinery system for the production of fuels, chemicals, and plastics was analyzed using the commercial Commercial Sale Price/Production Cost ratio criteria, under different production scenarios. More income can be earned from 1,3-propanediol and 1,2-propanediol production, while less income would be obtained from hydrogen and succinic acid. This analysis may be useful mainly for biodiesel producers since several profitable alternatives are presented and discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.151 |