Can rebamipide and proton pump inhibitor combination therapy promote the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection–induced ulcers? A randomized, prospective, multicenter study

Background There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)–induced ulcers. Objective To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-04, Vol.75 (4), p.739-747
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Woon Geon, MD, Kim, Sung Jung, MD, Choi, Min Ho, MD, Kim, Kyoung Oh, MD, PhD, Jang, Hyun Joo, MD, Park, Cheol Hee, MD, PhD, Baek, Il Hyun, MD, Kim, Kyung Ho, MD, Baik, Gwang Ho, MD, Kae, Sea Hyub, MD, PhD, Kim, Jong Hyeok, MD, PhD, Kim, Hak Yang, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)–induced ulcers. Objective To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing. Design Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial. Setting Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea. Patients This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer. Intervention PPI and rebamipide combination therapy. Main Outcome Measurements The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD. Results The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481). Limitations Open-label study. Conclusion PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01167101 .)
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.004