A randomized trial comparing rates of abdominal contamination and postoperative infection among natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and open surgery in pigs
Background Bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity and infectious complications have been debated concerning transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. Objective The aim of this study was to compare bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity and cli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-04, Vol.75 (4), p.849-855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity and infectious complications have been debated concerning transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. Objective The aim of this study was to compare bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity and clinically relevant infections after open, laparoscopic, and transgastric NOTES procedures. Design Randomized survival study in a porcine model. Setting Animal laboratory at a university hospital. Intervention Thirty pigs were randomized to open, laparoscopic, or transgastric NOTES uterine horn resection under sterile conditions. Bacterial cultures were obtained from the pelvic area immediately at entry of the abdominal cavity and just before closure. The left uterine horn was dissected and ligated. The animals survived for 4 weeks. At necropsy, bacterial culture was obtained from the pelvic area. Main Outcome Measurements Perioperative: operation time and incision length, bacterial growth in abdominal samples. Postoperative: infections or complications, weight gain. Necropsy: signs of peritonitis or infection, abdominal bacterial growth. Results Procedure time was significantly longer for transgastric NOTES. At the start of the procedure, 4 of the NOTES animals showed positive cultures, but only 1 showed positive cultures at the end. No open surgery or laparoscopic surgery animals showed positive cultures at these time points. At necropsy, none of the animals in the NOTES group showed bacterial growth, whereas 4 open surgery animals and 3 laparoscopic surgery animals had positive cultures. Four of these animals (2 from each group) had concurrent wound infections. Limitations Small sample size and lack of power calculation. Conclusion This study indicates that clinically relevant infections are rare after transgastric NOTES procedures despite evidence of bacterial contamination and longer operating times. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.039 |