15-Year Experience with Surgical Treatment of Duodenal Carcinoma: a Comparison of Periampullary and Extra-Ampullary Duodenal Carcinomas
Background The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas and segmental duodenal resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy and to evaluate prognostic factors. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all adults treated for duodenal a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2012-04, Vol.16 (4), p.682-691 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas and segmental duodenal resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy and to evaluate prognostic factors.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of all adults treated for duodenal adenocarcinoma by operative resection at a large tertiary referral center from 1994 to 2009.
Results
One hundred twenty-four patients had an operation for duodenal adenocarcinoma over a 15-year period (periampullary,
n
= 25, and extra-ampullary,
n
= 99). Ninety-nine patients (80%) underwent curative resection, including 24 (96%) with periampullary and 75 (76%) with extra-ampullary carcinomas. The average number of lymph nodes sampled was eight with segmental resection and 12 with pancreatoduodenectomy (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11605-011-1808-z |