15-Year Experience with Surgical Treatment of Duodenal Carcinoma: a Comparison of Periampullary and Extra-Ampullary Duodenal Carcinomas

Background The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas and segmental duodenal resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy and to evaluate prognostic factors. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all adults treated for duodenal a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2012-04, Vol.16 (4), p.682-691
Hauptverfasser: Onkendi, Edwin O., Boostrom, Sarah Y., Sarr, Michael G., Farnell, Michael B., Nagorney, David M., Donohue, John H., Kendrick, Michael L., Reid-Lombardo, Kaye M., Harmsen, William S., Que, Florencia G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of periampullary and extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas and segmental duodenal resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy and to evaluate prognostic factors. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all adults treated for duodenal adenocarcinoma by operative resection at a large tertiary referral center from 1994 to 2009. Results One hundred twenty-four patients had an operation for duodenal adenocarcinoma over a 15-year period (periampullary, n  = 25, and extra-ampullary, n  = 99). Ninety-nine patients (80%) underwent curative resection, including 24 (96%) with periampullary and 75 (76%) with extra-ampullary carcinomas. The average number of lymph nodes sampled was eight with segmental resection and 12 with pancreatoduodenectomy ( p  
ISSN:1091-255X
1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-011-1808-z