EGFR Molecular Profiling in Advanced NSCLC: A Prospective Phase II Study in Molecularly/Clinically Selected Patients Pretreated with Chemotherapy

The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic oncology 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.672-680
Hauptverfasser: Milella, Michele, Nuzzo, Carmen, Bria, Emilio, Sperduti, Isabella, Visca, Paolo, Buttitta, Fiamma, Antoniani, Barbara, Merola, Roberta, Gelibter, Alain, Cuppone, Federica, D'Alicandro, Valerio, Ceribelli, Anna, Rinaldi, Massimo, Cianciulli, Anna, Felicioni, Lara, Malatesta, Sara, Marchetti, Antonio, Mottolese, Marcella, Cognetti, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (
ISSN:1556-0864
1556-1380
DOI:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824a8bde