Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence

Introduction and hypothesis The 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test. Methods Women with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2012-04, Vol.23 (4), p.429-433
Hauptverfasser: Price, Danielle Markle, Noblett, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction and hypothesis The 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test. Methods Women with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwent a cough stress test, a 24-h pad test, and urodynamic testing. Results Complete data were available on 55 women. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the stress test occurred in 89% of women ( k  = 0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 90%, 80%, 98%, and 44%. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the pad test occurred in 60% of women ( k  = 0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 60%, 60%, 94%, and 13%. Agreement between the cough stress test and the pad test occurred in 67% ( k  = 0.26). Conclusions The cough stress test is more reliable than the pad test for documentation of stress urinary incontinence.
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-011-1602-1