Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence
Introduction and hypothesis The 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test. Methods Women with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2012-04, Vol.23 (4), p.429-433 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction and hypothesis
The 24-h pad test and cough stress test are commonly used to assess stress urinary incontinence; however, no comparative data are available. The cough stress test is superior to the 24-h pad test.
Methods
Women with predominant stress urinary incontinence symptoms underwent a cough stress test, a 24-h pad test, and urodynamic testing.
Results
Complete data were available on 55 women. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the stress test occurred in 89% of women (
k
= 0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 90%, 80%, 98%, and 44%. Agreement between the urodynamic results and the pad test occurred in 60% of women (
k
= 0.08). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 60%, 60%, 94%, and 13%. Agreement between the cough stress test and the pad test occurred in 67% (
k
= 0.26).
Conclusions
The cough stress test is more reliable than the pad test for documentation of stress urinary incontinence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-011-1602-1 |