Effects of up-titration of candesartan versus candesartan plus amlodipine on kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to combined treatment with an ARB and a calcium channel blocker for the same degree of blood pressure (BP) reduction, with respect to urinary albumin excretion in diabetic p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human hypertension 2012-04, Vol.26 (4), p.214-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to combined treatment with an ARB and a calcium channel blocker for the same degree of blood pressure (BP) reduction, with respect to urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients treated with a standard dose of the ARB. Hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria (⩾30 mg g
−1
creatinine) were enroled in the study, and were either started on or switched to candesartan (8 mg per day) monotherapy. After a 12-week run-in period, baseline evaluations were performed and patients with BP ⩾130/80 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan (12 mg per day) or candesartan (8 mg per day) plus amlodipine (2.5 mg per day) for a further 12 weeks. The primary end-point was a reduction in urinary albumin levels. Although there was no significant difference in the BP reduction between the two groups, the reduction in urinary albumin was greater in the up-titrated than the combination therapy group (−40±14% vs −9±38%, respectively;
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-9240 1476-5527 |
DOI: | 10.1038/jhh.2011.22 |