Effects of up-titration of candesartan versus candesartan plus amlodipine on kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to combined treatment with an ARB and a calcium channel blocker for the same degree of blood pressure (BP) reduction, with respect to urinary albumin excretion in diabetic p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human hypertension 2012-04, Vol.26 (4), p.214-219
Hauptverfasser: Okura, T, Kojima, M, Machida, H, Sugiyama, M, Kato, T, Komada, T, Miyazaki, T, Ninomiya, T, Ichikawa, T, Nakatani, K, Watanabe, Y, Dohi, Y, Ito, M, Kimura, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that up-titrating the dose of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is superior to combined treatment with an ARB and a calcium channel blocker for the same degree of blood pressure (BP) reduction, with respect to urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients treated with a standard dose of the ARB. Hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria (⩾30 mg g −1 creatinine) were enroled in the study, and were either started on or switched to candesartan (8 mg per day) monotherapy. After a 12-week run-in period, baseline evaluations were performed and patients with BP ⩾130/80 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive either candesartan (12 mg per day) or candesartan (8 mg per day) plus amlodipine (2.5 mg per day) for a further 12 weeks. The primary end-point was a reduction in urinary albumin levels. Although there was no significant difference in the BP reduction between the two groups, the reduction in urinary albumin was greater in the up-titrated than the combination therapy group (−40±14% vs −9±38%, respectively; P
ISSN:0950-9240
1476-5527
DOI:10.1038/jhh.2011.22