An exploration of livestock-development policies in western China

► Whole-farm effects of livestock-development policies in western China are studied. ► Reducing forage trade barriers and providing lucerne subsidies lifts net incomes. ► Greater lucerne acreage increases both net incomes and grain market purchases. ► Household diversity results in heterogeneous inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food policy 2012-02, Vol.37 (1), p.12-20
Hauptverfasser: Komarek, Adam M., Waldron, Scott A., Brown, Colin G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Whole-farm effects of livestock-development policies in western China are studied. ► Reducing forage trade barriers and providing lucerne subsidies lifts net incomes. ► Greater lucerne acreage increases both net incomes and grain market purchases. ► Household diversity results in heterogeneous income responses. ► Increased crop-livestock integration can reduce income variability. Limited agricultural land potential, poorly integrated markets and low rural incomes are all interrelated problems for agricultural households in western China. Within the wide range of development options available, this paper focuses on the impact of forage-growing subsidies and reducing livestock feed trade barriers on agricultural household incomes and enterprise mixes in the Qingyang Prefecture of Gansu Province, China. A heterogeneous-agent model is used to assess the local consequences of these two policies. Data from a survey conducted in 2009 are used as inputs into the model. The results indicate that a simultaneous reduction in livestock feed trade barriers and an introduction of forage-growing subsidies lifts net household incomes by approximately 10%. Different scenarios have different impacts on incomes, land allocation decisions and grain purchases, with heterogeneity also found among household income responses. Livestock-development policies have the potential to lift household incomes however there are tradeoffs between income and grain self-sufficiency.
ISSN:0306-9192
1873-5657
DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.10.001