LuxS distribution and AI-2 activity of Campylobacter spp

Aims:  This study investigates the distribution of LuxS within Campylobacter (Camp.) species and Autoinducer (AI)‐2 activity of Camp. jejuni NCTC 11168 in food matrices. Methods and Results:  LuxS (S‐ribosylhomocysteinase) sequences of different Campylobacter spp. were compared, and AI‐2 activity wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied microbiology 2012-03, Vol.112 (3), p.571-578
Hauptverfasser: Gölz, G., Adler, L., Huehn, S., Alter, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims:  This study investigates the distribution of LuxS within Campylobacter (Camp.) species and Autoinducer (AI)‐2 activity of Camp. jejuni NCTC 11168 in food matrices. Methods and Results:  LuxS (S‐ribosylhomocysteinase) sequences of different Campylobacter spp. were compared, and AI‐2 activity was measured with an AI‐2 reporter assay. Highest LuxS homologies were shared by Camp. jejuni, Camp. coli and Camp. upsaliensis, and their LuxS sequences had more similarities to the analysed Arcobacter and Vibrio harveyi strains than to all other analysed Campylobacter species. Of 15 analysed species only Camp. lari, Camp. peloridis and Camp. insulaenigrae did not produce AI‐2 molecules. Cultivation of Camp. jejuni NCTC 11168 in chicken juice reduced AI‐2 activity, and this reduction is not because of lower luxS expression or functionality. Conclusion:  Not all Campylobacter species encode luxS. Food matrices can reduce AI‐2 activity in a LuxS‐independent manner. Significance and Impact of the Study:  Besides, Camp. lari, Camp. peloridis and Camp. insulaenigrae do not show AI‐2 activity. Further investigations should clarify the function of AI‐2 in Campylobacter spp. and how species lacking luxS could overcome this alteration. Furthermore, the impact of food matrices on these functions needs to be determined as we could show that chicken juice reduced AI‐2 activity.
ISSN:1364-5072
1365-2672
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05221.x