Sentinel node navigation surgery versus observation as a management strategy for early tongue carcinoma

Background The status of lymph nodes in the neck is the most important prognostic factor for the outcomes of patients with oral tongue cancer. However, surgical prophylaxis of the neck is controversial. Methods We reviewed 22 patients with clinically T1/T2, N0 Union Internationale Contre le Cancer o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Head & neck 2012-04, Vol.34 (4), p.568-572
Hauptverfasser: Yamauchi, Kohichi, Fujioka, Yasunori, Kohno, Naoyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The status of lymph nodes in the neck is the most important prognostic factor for the outcomes of patients with oral tongue cancer. However, surgical prophylaxis of the neck is controversial. Methods We reviewed 22 patients with clinically T1/T2, N0 Union Internationale Contre le Cancer oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Patients were assigned to groups according to the management strategy selected for the neck. One group underwent a “watchful waiting” policy and the other underwent sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS). Results Three of 11 patients (27%) in the watchful waiting group developed regional recurrence and underwent neck dissection. Only 1 of 11 patients (9.1%) in the SNNS group developed regional recurrence. Although the groups did not significantly differ, the SNNS group tended to have less regional recurrence. Conclusion SNNS should be the third strategy formanaging early oral tongue carcinoma. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2012
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.21776