Implications of incidental finding of testicular microlithiasis in paediatric patients

Abstract Objective To improve understanding of the implications of testicular microlithiasis (TM) in paediatric patients diagnosed incidentally on scrotal ultrasonography (US). Patients and methods 31 boys aged 4–14 years diagnosed with TM based on US between February 2000 and September 2007 were re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric urology 2012-04, Vol.8 (2), p.162-165
Hauptverfasser: Chiang, Li Wei, Yap, Te-Lu, Asiri, Musaed Mohammed, Phaik Ong, Caroline Choo, Low, Yee, Jacobsen, Anette Sundfor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To improve understanding of the implications of testicular microlithiasis (TM) in paediatric patients diagnosed incidentally on scrotal ultrasonography (US). Patients and methods 31 boys aged 4–14 years diagnosed with TM based on US between February 2000 and September 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, indications for US, associated inguino-scrotal pathologies and follow-up data were collated. Results A total of 59 testes were evaluated. Fifty-four had TM at US. The most common indication for US was scrotal swelling ( n  = 17). Twenty patients (65%) had at least one associated inguino-scrotal pathology related to patent processus vaginalis, with cryptorchidism being the most frequently observed (39%). On follow up (mean 39.6 months), 6 patients documented decrease or resolution of TM, while 2 showed increase in TM density. No testicular malignancy was observed during follow up. Conclusions TM is commonly diagnosed incidentally on US in paediatric patients. A literature review revealed few case reports on its association with testicular malignancy and a prevalence of 4.2% among asymptomatic boys. The spontaneous resolution of TM supports degeneration of seminiferous tubules as the possible cause and further questions its malignant implication. An appropriate surveillance scheme would require involvement of a well-informed patient and parent with good compliance on testicular self-examination.
ISSN:1477-5131
1873-4898
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.03.013