Flexural and compression response of woven E-glass/polyester–CNF nanophased composites
A significant improvement in fiber reinforced polymeric composite (FRPC) materials can be obtained by incorporating a very small amount of nanofiller in the matrix material. In this work, an ultrasonic liquid processor was used to infuse carbon nanofiber (CNF) into the polyester matrix which was the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing Applied science and manufacturing, 2011-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1774-1782 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A significant improvement in fiber reinforced polymeric composite (FRPC) materials can be obtained by incorporating a very small amount of nanofiller in the matrix material. In this work, an ultrasonic liquid processor was used to infuse carbon nanofiber (CNF) into the polyester matrix which was then mixed with catalyst using a mechanical agitator. Both conventional and CNF-filled glass-fiber reinforced polyester composites (GRPC) were fabricated using the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. Excellent dispersion of CNFs into the polyester resin was observed from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs. Flexural and quasi-static tests were performed for investigating the mechanical responses. Fracture surface was examined using optical microscopy (OM) and SEM. Flexure tests performed on the conventional GRPC, 0.1–0.4
wt.% CNF-filled GRPC showed up to 49% and 31% increase in the flexural strength and modulus, respectively, compared to the conventional one with increasing loading of CNFs up to 0.2
wt.%. Similar trend was seen in quasi-static compression properties. SEM evaluation revealed relatively less damage in the tested fracture surfaces of the nanophased composites in terms of matrix failure, fiber breakage, matrix–fiber debonding, and delamination, compared to the conventional one. This might be the result of better interfacial interaction between matrix and fibers, due to the presence of CNFs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-835X 1878-5840 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.033 |