Vinylene carbonate and vinylene trithiocarbonate as electrolyte additives for lithium ion battery

In EC/DEC, VTC easily formed C–O–C-like components and sulfide species (C–S–S–C, S and C–S–C), but in PC/DEC VTC did not easily form polymeric species which protected the graphite anode from exfoliation. [Display omitted] ► Vinylene carbonate (VC) and vinylene trithiocarbonate (VTC) are studied as e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of power sources 2011-11, Vol.196 (22), p.9605-9611
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Chia-Chin, Hsu, Sheng-Hsiang, Jung, Yi-Fang, Yang, Chien-Hsin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In EC/DEC, VTC easily formed C–O–C-like components and sulfide species (C–S–S–C, S and C–S–C), but in PC/DEC VTC did not easily form polymeric species which protected the graphite anode from exfoliation. [Display omitted] ► Vinylene carbonate (VC) and vinylene trithiocarbonate (VTC) are studied as electrolyte additives in two kinds of electrolytes: (1) propylene carbonate (PC) based; (2) ethylene carbonate (EC) based. ► VTC followed different reaction pathways for the PC-based verses EC-based solvents. ► In EC/DEC, VTC easily formed C–O–C-like components and sulfide species (C–S–S–C, S and C–S–C), but in PC/DEC VTC did not easily form polymeric species which protected the graphite anode from exfoliation. Vinylene carbonate (VC) and vinylene trithiocarbonate (VTC) are studied as electrolyte additives in two kinds of electrolytes: (1) propylene carbonate (PC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) (1:2 by weight) 1 mol dm −3 LiPF 6; (2) ethylene carbonate (EC) and DEC (1:2 by weight) 1 mol dm −3 LiPF 6. Characterization is performed by cyclic voltammetry, impedance spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and half cell tests. Cyclic life is better in either electrolyte with VC than either electrolyte with/without VTC. SEM shows VC and VTC both form well developed passivation films on the graphite anode, but the films with VTC are thicker than with VC. EIS shows the VTC films have significantly higher charge transfer resistance. The VTC film in PC fails to protect against exfoliation. XPS indicates VTC has different reaction pathways in PC relative to EC. In EC/DEC, VTC forms polymeric C–O–C-like components and sulfide species (C–S–S–C, S and C–S–C). In PC/DEC, VTC does not form polymeric species, instead forming a film mainly containing LiF and Li 2S. It appears that a thinner polymeric film is preferential. The specific data herein are of interest, and the general conclusions may help development of improved additives for enhanced Li-ion battery performance.
ISSN:0378-7753
1873-2755
DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.058