Adaptive Licensing: Taking the Next Step in the Evolution of Drug Approval

Traditional drug licensing approaches are based on binary decisions. At the moment of licensing, an experimental therapy is presumptively transformed into a fully vetted, safe, efficacious therapy. By contrast, adaptive licensing (AL) approaches are based on stepwise learning under conditions of ack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2012-03, Vol.91 (3), p.426-437
Hauptverfasser: Eichler, H‐G, Oye, K, Baird, L G, Abadie, E, Brown, J, Drum, C L, Ferguson, J, Garner, S, Honig, P, Hukkelhoven, M, Lim, J C W, Lim, R, Lumpkin, M M, Neil, G, O'Rourke, B, Pezalla, E, Shoda, D, Seyfert‐Margolis, V, Sigal, E V, Sobotka, J, Tan, D, Unger, T F, Hirsch, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Traditional drug licensing approaches are based on binary decisions. At the moment of licensing, an experimental therapy is presumptively transformed into a fully vetted, safe, efficacious therapy. By contrast, adaptive licensing (AL) approaches are based on stepwise learning under conditions of acknowledged uncertainty, with iterative phases of data gathering and regulatory evaluation. This approach allows approval to align more closely with patient needs for timely access to new technologies and for data to inform medical decisions. The concept of AL embraces a range of perspectives. Some see AL as an evolutionary step, extending elements that are now in place. Others envision a transformative framework that may require legislative action before implementation. This article summarizes recent AL proposals; discusses how proposals might be translated into practice, with illustrations in different therapeutic areas; and identifies unresolved issues to inform decisions on the design and implementation of AL. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2012); 91 3, 426–437. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.345
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1038/clpt.2011.345