Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis

Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle surgery 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.22-24
Hauptverfasser: Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS, El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh, Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Foot and ankle surgery
container_volume 18
creator Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS
El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh
Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS
description Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively compared. Results 43 neuromas were excised from 36 patients over 68 months. The commonest clinical symptoms were tenderness on direct palpation (100%), pain on weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 98% (42/43). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16). Conclusion There is no absolute requirement for imaging patients who clinically have a Morton's neuroma. The two main indications for imaging are (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one web space is affected. Ultrasonography should be the investigation of choice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921425396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1268773111000245</els_id><sourcerecordid>921425396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f89520b18b1685736564e653d8392d5057839e33c6d0311292e1954758f2af083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1LJDEQxcPisn6sf4AX6ZunHlNJJ91REAbxC1z2sOs5ZNLVQ8aejqamBf97M87owYNQkCK896B-j7Ej4BPgoE8Xk87RRHCACc_D6x9sDyrNS6OaaifvQjdlXUvYZftEC54VhstfbFcIKZQxZo-d_YlpFYcTKgYcU1y6s2Ja-D4Mwbu-eMFEIxXJtSH2cf7-1wY3HyIF-s1-dq4nPNy-B-zh-ur_5W15__fm7nJ6X3opxKrsGqMEn0EzA92oWmqlK9RKto00olVc1XlBKb1uuQQQRiAYVdWq6YTreCMP2Mkm9ynF5xFpZZeBPPa9GzCOZI2ASihpdFbCRulTJErY2acUli69WuB2TcwubCZm18Qsz8Pr7Dnepo-zJbafjg9EWXC-EWC-8SVgsuQDDh7bkNCvbBvDt_EXX9wfcB_xFWkRxzRkeBYsCcvtv3Vl68YAcluiUvINKtiNoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921425396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS ; El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh ; Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</creator><creatorcontrib>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS ; El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh ; Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively compared. Results 43 neuromas were excised from 36 patients over 68 months. The commonest clinical symptoms were tenderness on direct palpation (100%), pain on weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 98% (42/43). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16). Conclusion There is no absolute requirement for imaging patients who clinically have a Morton's neuroma. The two main indications for imaging are (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one web space is affected. Ultrasonography should be the investigation of choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1268-7731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22325999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Metatarsalgia - diagnosis ; Metatarsalgia - surgery ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - pathology ; Middle Aged ; Morton's neuroma ; Orthopedics ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Foot and ankle surgery, 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.22-24</ispartof><rights>European Foot and Ankle Society</rights><rights>2011 European Foot and Ankle Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f89520b18b1685736564e653d8392d5057839e33c6d0311292e1954758f2af083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f89520b18b1685736564e653d8392d5057839e33c6d0311292e1954758f2af083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22325999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><title>Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis</title><title>Foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively compared. Results 43 neuromas were excised from 36 patients over 68 months. The commonest clinical symptoms were tenderness on direct palpation (100%), pain on weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 98% (42/43). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16). Conclusion There is no absolute requirement for imaging patients who clinically have a Morton's neuroma. The two main indications for imaging are (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one web space is affected. Ultrasonography should be the investigation of choice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsalgia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Metatarsalgia - surgery</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morton's neuroma</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1268-7731</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1LJDEQxcPisn6sf4AX6ZunHlNJJ91REAbxC1z2sOs5ZNLVQ8aejqamBf97M87owYNQkCK896B-j7Ej4BPgoE8Xk87RRHCACc_D6x9sDyrNS6OaaifvQjdlXUvYZftEC54VhstfbFcIKZQxZo-d_YlpFYcTKgYcU1y6s2Ja-D4Mwbu-eMFEIxXJtSH2cf7-1wY3HyIF-s1-dq4nPNy-B-zh-ur_5W15__fm7nJ6X3opxKrsGqMEn0EzA92oWmqlK9RKto00olVc1XlBKb1uuQQQRiAYVdWq6YTreCMP2Mkm9ynF5xFpZZeBPPa9GzCOZI2ASihpdFbCRulTJErY2acUli69WuB2TcwubCZm18Qsz8Pr7Dnepo-zJbafjg9EWXC-EWC-8SVgsuQDDh7bkNCvbBvDt_EXX9wfcB_xFWkRxzRkeBYsCcvtv3Vl68YAcluiUvINKtiNoQ</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS</creator><creator>El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh</creator><creator>Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis</title><author>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS ; El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh ; Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-f89520b18b1685736564e653d8392d5057839e33c6d0311292e1954758f2af083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsalgia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Metatarsalgia - surgery</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morton's neuroma</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS</au><au>El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh</au><au>Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>22-24</pages><issn>1268-7731</issn><eissn>1460-9584</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively compared. Results 43 neuromas were excised from 36 patients over 68 months. The commonest clinical symptoms were tenderness on direct palpation (100%), pain on weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 98% (42/43). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16). Conclusion There is no absolute requirement for imaging patients who clinically have a Morton's neuroma. The two main indications for imaging are (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one web space is affected. Ultrasonography should be the investigation of choice.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22325999</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1268-7731
ispartof Foot and ankle surgery, 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.22-24
issn 1268-7731
1460-9584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_921425396
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Metatarsalgia - diagnosis
Metatarsalgia - surgery
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - pathology
Middle Aged
Morton's neuroma
Orthopedics
Pain Measurement - methods
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography
title Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morton's%20neuroma:%20A%20clinical%20versus%20radiological%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Pastides,%20Philip,%20MBBS,%20BSc,%20MRCS&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=22-24&rft.issn=1268-7731&rft.eissn=1460-9584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E921425396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921425396&rft_id=info:pmid/22325999&rft_els_id=S1268773111000245&rfr_iscdi=true