Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis

Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle surgery 2012-03, Vol.18 (1), p.22-24
Hauptverfasser: Pastides, Philip, MBBS, BSc, MRCS, El-Sallakh, Sameh, MD, MCh, Charalambides, Charalambos, MD, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The aim of our study was to compare the clinical versus radiological diagnosis of patients suffering from a Morton's neuroma. Methods Clinical assessments and pre-operative radiological imaging of patients who had excision of a Morton's neuromas were retrospectively compared. Results 43 neuromas were excised from 36 patients over 68 months. The commonest clinical symptoms were tenderness on direct palpation (100%), pain on weight bearing (91%) which was relieved by rest (81%). The most sensitive clinical sign was a Mulder's click. Clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 98% (42/43). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and magnetic resonance imaging had a sensitivity of 88% (14/16). Conclusion There is no absolute requirement for imaging patients who clinically have a Morton's neuroma. The two main indications for imaging are (a) an unclear clinical assessment and (b) cases when more than one web space is affected. Ultrasonography should be the investigation of choice.
ISSN:1268-7731
1460-9584
DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.007