Prediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins

Please cite this paper as: Memmo A, Dias T, Mahsud‐Dornan S, Papageorghiou A, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Prediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins. BJOG 2012;119:417–421. Objective  To study the correlation of discrepancy between cro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2012-03, Vol.119 (4), p.417-421
Hauptverfasser: Memmo, A, Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, Papageorghiou, AT, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Please cite this paper as: Memmo A, Dias T, Mahsud‐Dornan S, Papageorghiou A, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Prediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins. BJOG 2012;119:417–421. Objective  To study the correlation of discrepancy between crown–rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT) in monochorionic twins at 11–14 weeks of gestation and subsequent development of twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) and selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR). Design  Retrospective cohort study. Setting  Tertiary‐care Fetal Medicine Unit, London. Sample  Monochorionic twin pregnancies with known outcome. Methods  Inter‐twin discrepancy was calculated as a percentage of the larger CRL and smaller NT and compared among those developing TTTS, those with sFGR and those with normal outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of inter‐twin discrepancy in prediction of sFGR and TTTS. Main outcome measures  Development of TTTS and sFGR. Results  A total of 242 monochorionic twin pregnancies were studied (102 TTTS, 36 sFGR and 104 controls). The median CRL discrepancy in the sFGR group (11.9%) was significantly higher (P 
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03250.x