Do Gastroenterologists Adhere to Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines for Celiac Disease?

AIM:Our group hypothesized that significant variation exists between suggested clinical guidelines, the clinical practices of practicing gastroenterologists and academic experts in celiac disease (CD). METHOD:We designed 4 CD vignettes comparing experts and practicing gastroenterologists. Practicing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2012-02, Vol.46 (2), p.e12-e20
Hauptverfasser: Parakkal, Deepak, Du, Hongyan, Semer, Rumi, Ehrenpreis, Eli Daniel, Guandalini, Stefano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIM:Our group hypothesized that significant variation exists between suggested clinical guidelines, the clinical practices of practicing gastroenterologists and academic experts in celiac disease (CD). METHOD:We designed 4 CD vignettes comparing experts and practicing gastroenterologists. Practicing gastroenterologists (n=169) were surveyed during Digestive Disease Week 2009 and experts (n=22) answered e-mail surveys. Ratings for answers in each vignette was done using a 9-point RAND Appropriateness Scale (RAS) with endorsement defined as RAS score of 7 to 9. We also calculated the RAND “Disagreement Index” (DI) was calculated, with DI>1.0 indicated extreme variation. RESULTS:A total of 169 practicing gastroenterologists and 22 experts were included. Differences in all vignette answers were present. Differences were seen for use of IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (P=0.0241), human leukocyte antigen DQ2/8 testing (P=0.0325), gluten challenge (P
ISSN:0192-0790
1539-2031
DOI:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f0da0