Do Gastroenterologists Adhere to Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines for Celiac Disease?
AIM:Our group hypothesized that significant variation exists between suggested clinical guidelines, the clinical practices of practicing gastroenterologists and academic experts in celiac disease (CD). METHOD:We designed 4 CD vignettes comparing experts and practicing gastroenterologists. Practicing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2012-02, Vol.46 (2), p.e12-e20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | AIM:Our group hypothesized that significant variation exists between suggested clinical guidelines, the clinical practices of practicing gastroenterologists and academic experts in celiac disease (CD).
METHOD:We designed 4 CD vignettes comparing experts and practicing gastroenterologists. Practicing gastroenterologists (n=169) were surveyed during Digestive Disease Week 2009 and experts (n=22) answered e-mail surveys. Ratings for answers in each vignette was done using a 9-point RAND Appropriateness Scale (RAS) with endorsement defined as RAS score of 7 to 9. We also calculated the RAND “Disagreement Index” (DI) was calculated, with DI>1.0 indicated extreme variation.
RESULTS:A total of 169 practicing gastroenterologists and 22 experts were included. Differences in all vignette answers were present. Differences were seen for use of IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (P=0.0241), human leukocyte antigen DQ2/8 testing (P=0.0325), gluten challenge (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0192-0790 1539-2031 |
DOI: | 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f0da0 |