Improved Refractive Outcome for Ciliary Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses
Objective To investigate the ideal correction of intraocular lens (IOL) power for sulcus implantation. Design Retrospective, comparative case series. Participants The records of 679 patients undergoing cataract surgery from June 2007 to June 2008 were reviewed. Intervention Eyes in this series under...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2012-02, Vol.119 (2), p.261-265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To investigate the ideal correction of intraocular lens (IOL) power for sulcus implantation. Design Retrospective, comparative case series. Participants The records of 679 patients undergoing cataract surgery from June 2007 to June 2008 were reviewed. Intervention Eyes in this series underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation with local anesthesia. Patients in our study population had their IOL power reduced by 0.5 or 1 diopter (D) from that calculated by the SRK-T formula for in-the-bag implantation. The IOL implanted was the foldable 3-piece acrylic Acrysof MA60AC (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Main Outcome Measures In each case, the difference between actual spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and that predicted by biometry using the SRK-T formula was calculated. Results Posterior capsule tears requiring implantation of IOL in the ciliary sulcus occurred in 36 eyes. When comparing eyes in which the power was reduced by 0.5 D with those in which the reduction was 1.0 D, those with a power reduction of 1.0 D had significantly less unexpected error (0.49 vs. 1.01 D SE). After stratifying eyes by axial length (AL), we found higher unexpected refractive error in short eyes (25 D had a greater postoperative refractive error. Conclusions This is the first comparative clinical review examining adjustment of power of the sulcus-implanted IOL. We found that the IOL power should be adjusted according to the measured AL and predicted IOL power. For patients with a predicted IOL power from 18 to 25 D, power should be reduced by at least 1 D; for lenses >25 D, power should be reduced by 1.5 to 2 D. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.050 |