Reliable logistics networks design with facility disruptions

► We model a reliable logistics network design problem with p-robustness constraints. ► The model produces supply chain networks that perform well under both nominal and disruption scenarios. ► We propose a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm to efficiently solve the problem. ► The p-robustness criterion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2011-09, Vol.45 (8), p.1190-1211
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Peng, Snyder, Lawrence V., Lim, Andrew, Liu, Zuli
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We model a reliable logistics network design problem with p-robustness constraints. ► The model produces supply chain networks that perform well under both nominal and disruption scenarios. ► We propose a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm to efficiently solve the problem. ► The p-robustness criterion is less conservative compared with other robustness measures. ► Substantial improvements in reliability are achievable with minimal increases in cost. This paper studies a strategic supply chain management problem to design reliable networks that perform as well as possible under normal conditions, while also performing relatively well when disruptions strike. We present a mixed-integer programming model whose objective is to minimize the nominal cost (the cost when no disruptions occur) while reducing the disruption risk using the p-robustness criterion (which bounds the cost in disruption scenarios). We propose a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm that is based on genetic algorithms, local improvement, and the shortest augmenting path method. Numerical tests show that the heuristic greatly outperforms CPLEX in terms of solution speed, while still delivering excellent solution quality. We demonstrate the tradeoff between the nominal cost and system reliability, showing that substantial improvements in reliability are often possible with minimal increases in cost. We also show that our model produces solutions that are less conservative than those generated by common robustness measures.
ISSN:0191-2615
1879-2367
DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.022