Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of peripheral soft-tissue tumors: Feasibility study and preliminary results
Abstract Objectives To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, to differentiate benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors and to assess the feasibility and interest of modelling enhancement curves. Patients and methods This retrospective study includes 118 patients with so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic and interventional imaging 2012, Vol.93 (1), p.37-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objectives To determine the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, to differentiate benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors and to assess the feasibility and interest of modelling enhancement curves. Patients and methods This retrospective study includes 118 patients with soft-tissue tumors, examined with ultrasound after injection of SonoVue® , a contrast product. The raw data were treated with CHI-Q acquisition software to model the enhancement curves. We analyzed tumor uptake of the contrast product visually and studied the enhancement curves, characterized by five parameters: peak intensity, time to peak, mean transit time, initial slope, and area under the curve. Results There were 81 benign and 37 malignant tumors. For a diagnosis of benign tumor, the absence of contrast uptake had a sensitivity of 60%, a specificity of 68%, a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative predictive of 83%. Study of the 70 curves obtained (48 benign and 22 malignant tumors) showed that the parameters of area under the curve (Chi2 = 8.6 and P < 0.005), slope (Chi2 = 8.12 and P = 0.004), and peak intensity (Chi2 = 7.55, P = 0.005) differed significantly between the two populations. Conclusion Absence of contrast uptake suggests a benign lesion. The study of enhancement curves showed significant differences between the different tumor populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-5684 2211-5684 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.diii.2011.11.007 |