Variability in constancy of the perceived surface reflectance across different illumination statistics

► The perceived reflectance of 3D objects depended on higher-order statistics of the light field. ► A wide range of the perceived reflectance data ( N > 80) was predicted ( r > 0.95) by subband histogram of the object image. ► Both constancy and inconstancy of reflectance perception are explai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 2012-01, Vol.53 (1), p.30-39
Hauptverfasser: Motoyoshi, Isamu, Matoba, Hiroaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► The perceived reflectance of 3D objects depended on higher-order statistics of the light field. ► A wide range of the perceived reflectance data ( N > 80) was predicted ( r > 0.95) by subband histogram of the object image. ► Both constancy and inconstancy of reflectance perception are explained in terms of the output of early spatial filtering. In contrast to the classical findings of lightness constancy, recent psychophysical studies show the strong dependency of the perceived reflectance of a surface on the structure of the natural illumination. The present study examined this inconstancy for systematic variations in the light field and an image-based explanation for it. Observers matched the specular and diffuse reflectance of a three-dimensional object in a complex scene under a fixed light field to that in the scene under different light fields with variable mean, contrast, and gamma. For the both specular and diffuse components, the matched reflectance was relatively constant against changes in the mean illuminance but varied extensively with changes in the contrast and gamma of the light field. We found that the matching data were well predicted by the similarity of the subband histograms of the images. The results support the notion that early spatial filtering can provide a unified account of both the constancy in the perceived surface reflectance against mean illuminance and the inconstancy for higher-order illumination statistics.
ISSN:0042-6989
1878-5646
DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2011.11.010