Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure
Standard and light surgical meshes with identical knitted structure: Parietene Standard/Parietene Light and Premilene/Optilene were chosen for hernioplasty in 20 rats. Six months after surgery, the complications were primarily related to inflammation in groups with implanted standard meshes and with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine 2011-02, Vol.150 (4), p.459-464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | Anurov, M. V. Titkova, S. M. Oettinger, A. P. |
description | Standard and light surgical meshes with identical knitted structure: Parietene Standard/Parietene Light and Premilene/Optilene were chosen for hernioplasty in 20 rats. Six months after surgery, the complications were primarily related to inflammation in groups with implanted standard meshes and with prosthesis deformation in groups with light meshes. The character of complications was determined by characteristics of knitting structure and mechanical proprieties of surgical meshes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917578062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356808806</galeid><sourcerecordid>A356808806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3885ecdce7c8c2e83987a584cfa20bc54ebfe227c0a888f514a59428dbd2419b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kktv1TAQhS0EopfCD2CDLJBglWI7duIsq8ujFReBKKwtx5ncuErsW9sRKr8eh5RHEciL0Yy_c-SxDkKPKTmhhNQvIyWC1gWhtKC0kgW_gzZU1GUhGaN30YZkqOBSyiP0IMbLpSUVvY-OGGOVJLzcoG9bPx10sNE77HucBsCfIM5jikt7BsFZjV9BDybhj6OO6Rp_tWnAF0m7TocO54J3dj8kfDGHvTV6xO8hDhBX7rwDl35M3zmbEnRZGWaT5gAP0b1ejxEe3dRj9OXN68_bs2L34e359nRXGF7JVJRSCjCdgdpIw0CWjay1kNz0mpHWCA5tD4zVhui8aS8o16LhTHZtxzht2vIYvVh9D8FfzRCTmmw0MI7agZ-jamgtakkqlsmnf5GXfg4uP05JUfOGElpl6NkK7fUIyrrep6DNYqlOS5G_VWavTJ38g8qng8ka76C3eX5L8PwPwQB6TEP045ysd_E2SFfQBB9jgF4dgp10uFaUqCUWao2FyrFQSywUz5onN4vN7QTdL8XPHGSArUDMV24P4ffm_3f9Dr-hwKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857491016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Anurov, M. V. ; Titkova, S. M. ; Oettinger, A. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anurov, M. V. ; Titkova, S. M. ; Oettinger, A. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Standard and light surgical meshes with identical knitted structure: Parietene Standard/Parietene Light and Premilene/Optilene were chosen for hernioplasty in 20 rats. Six months after surgery, the complications were primarily related to inflammation in groups with implanted standard meshes and with prosthesis deformation in groups with light meshes. The character of complications was determined by characteristics of knitting structure and mechanical proprieties of surgical meshes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22268043</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEXBAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Comparative analysis ; Experimental Methods for Clinical Practice ; Hernia ; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Internal Medicine ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Materials Testing ; Pathology ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Surgical Mesh</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2011-02, Vol.150 (4), p.459-464</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3885ecdce7c8c2e83987a584cfa20bc54ebfe227c0a888f514a59428dbd2419b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3885ecdce7c8c2e83987a584cfa20bc54ebfe227c0a888f514a59428dbd2419b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anurov, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titkova, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oettinger, A. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure</title><title>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><description>Standard and light surgical meshes with identical knitted structure: Parietene Standard/Parietene Light and Premilene/Optilene were chosen for hernioplasty in 20 rats. Six months after surgery, the complications were primarily related to inflammation in groups with implanted standard meshes and with prosthesis deformation in groups with light meshes. The character of complications was determined by characteristics of knitting structure and mechanical proprieties of surgical meshes.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Experimental Methods for Clinical Practice</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><issn>0007-4888</issn><issn>1573-8221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kktv1TAQhS0EopfCD2CDLJBglWI7duIsq8ujFReBKKwtx5ncuErsW9sRKr8eh5RHEciL0Yy_c-SxDkKPKTmhhNQvIyWC1gWhtKC0kgW_gzZU1GUhGaN30YZkqOBSyiP0IMbLpSUVvY-OGGOVJLzcoG9bPx10sNE77HucBsCfIM5jikt7BsFZjV9BDybhj6OO6Rp_tWnAF0m7TocO54J3dj8kfDGHvTV6xO8hDhBX7rwDl35M3zmbEnRZGWaT5gAP0b1ejxEe3dRj9OXN68_bs2L34e359nRXGF7JVJRSCjCdgdpIw0CWjay1kNz0mpHWCA5tD4zVhui8aS8o16LhTHZtxzht2vIYvVh9D8FfzRCTmmw0MI7agZ-jamgtakkqlsmnf5GXfg4uP05JUfOGElpl6NkK7fUIyrrep6DNYqlOS5G_VWavTJ38g8qng8ka76C3eX5L8PwPwQB6TEP045ysd_E2SFfQBB9jgF4dgp10uFaUqCUWao2FyrFQSywUz5onN4vN7QTdL8XPHGSArUDMV24P4ffm_3f9Dr-hwKc</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Anurov, M. V.</creator><creator>Titkova, S. M.</creator><creator>Oettinger, A. P.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure</title><author>Anurov, M. V. ; Titkova, S. M. ; Oettinger, A. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-3885ecdce7c8c2e83987a584cfa20bc54ebfe227c0a888f514a59428dbd2419b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Experimental Methods for Clinical Practice</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anurov, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titkova, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oettinger, A. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anurov, M. V.</au><au>Titkova, S. M.</au><au>Oettinger, A. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</jtitle><stitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</stitle><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>459-464</pages><issn>0007-4888</issn><eissn>1573-8221</eissn><coden>BEXBAN</coden><abstract>Standard and light surgical meshes with identical knitted structure: Parietene Standard/Parietene Light and Premilene/Optilene were chosen for hernioplasty in 20 rats. Six months after surgery, the complications were primarily related to inflammation in groups with implanted standard meshes and with prosthesis deformation in groups with light meshes. The character of complications was determined by characteristics of knitting structure and mechanical proprieties of surgical meshes.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>22268043</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-4888 |
ispartof | Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2011-02, Vol.150 (4), p.459-464 |
issn | 0007-4888 1573-8221 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_917578062 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Animals Biocompatible Materials Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cell Biology Comparative analysis Experimental Methods for Clinical Practice Hernia Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects Herniorrhaphy - methods Internal Medicine Laboratory Medicine Male Materials Testing Pathology Prosthesis Implantation Rats Rats, Wistar Surgical Mesh |
title | Comparison of the Results of Hernia Defect Plasty with Standard and Light Surgical Meshes with Identical Knitted Structure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Results%20of%20Hernia%20Defect%20Plasty%20with%20Standard%20and%20Light%20Surgical%20Meshes%20with%20Identical%20Knitted%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20experimental%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Anurov,%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=459-464&rft.issn=0007-4888&rft.eissn=1573-8221&rft.coden=BEXBAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10517-011-1168-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356808806%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857491016&rft_id=info:pmid/22268043&rft_galeid=A356808806&rfr_iscdi=true |