Association between photoreceptor integrity and visual outcome in diabetic macular edema

Purpose To investigate the correlation between foveal photoreceptor integrity and final visual acuity (VA) after treatment of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to determine the visual prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively studied 61 eyes of 52 patients with DME who were treated su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2012-01, Vol.250 (1), p.61-70
Hauptverfasser: Shin, Hyun Jin, Lee, Seung Hyen, Chung, Hyewon, Kim, Hyung Chan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate the correlation between foveal photoreceptor integrity and final visual acuity (VA) after treatment of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME), and to determine the visual prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively studied 61 eyes of 52 patients with DME who were treated successfully with intravitreal triamcinolone injection (IVTA). Using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), the eyes were categorized into three groups at the final visit according to restoration of the photoreceptor inner and outer segment junction (IS/OS) and the external limiting membrane (ELM): (1) the A group, with a completely visible IS/OS and ELM, (2) the B group, with a disrupted IS/OS and intact ELM, and (3) the C group, with a disrupted or loss of the IS/OS and ELM. Disrupted IS/OS length (DIL), disrupted ELM length (DEL), and mean disrupted IS/OS and ELM length (DIEL) were measured at the initial and final visits. Foveal thickness (FT), macular center thickness (MCT), and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness were also measured at the initial and final visits. Multivariate analysis testing was performed over the measured SD OCT variables. Results Final VA was closely associated with IS/OS integrity at the final visit; final VA (logMAR) in the A group (0.21 ± 0.14; 31 eyes) or B group (0.31 ± 0.21; 15 eyes) was significantly better than that in the C group (0.45 ± 0.33; 15 eyes) ( p  
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-011-1774-x