Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer: size matters
Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is considered a curative option for selected T1 rectal cancer. Although TEM is safe, local recurrence (LR) rates after TEM are unacceptably high. Evidence on selection criteria, however, is not abundant. To expand evidence on low- versus high-risk T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2012-02, Vol.26 (2), p.551-557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is considered a curative option for selected T1 rectal cancer. Although TEM is safe, local recurrence (LR) rates after TEM are unacceptably high. Evidence on selection criteria, however, is not abundant. To expand evidence on low- versus high-risk T1 rectal cancer with respect to LR, this study aimed to identify predictive histopathologic factors in a selected group of T1 rectal cancers treated with TEM only.
Methods
The study enrolled 62 patients for whom specimens of the primary tumor containing an invasive T1 carcinoma could be reevaluated. Tumors were scored according to predefined criteria, and analysis of predictive factors for locoregional failure was performed.
Result
Local recurrence rates at 3 years for tumors 3 cm in size or smaller were significantly lower than for tumors larger than 3 cm (16 vs. 39%;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-011-1918-4 |