Palaeomagnetic remanences in high‐grade metamorphic rocks of the Everest region: indication for Late Miocene crustal doming

SUMMARY High‐grade metamorphic rocks of the upper amphibolite to granulite facies in the Higher Himalayan crystalline (HHC) were studied for their appropriateness for palaeomagnetic investigations. Sampling and fieldwork was accomplished on a south–north transect at ∼87°E in the Khumbu region south of Everest. Paragenesis of iron‐sulphides and oxides was found to be variable due to different source rocks and metamorphic conditions in this area. Unblocking temperature ranges, isothermal remanence acquisition, low‐temperature magnetic properties and microscopic observations confirm the presence of pyrrhotite and magnetite. Two remanence components were separated with unblocking temperature intervals of 250–330 °C and 370–550 °C, which can be attributed to characteristic remanent magnetizations (ChRM) of monoclinic pyrrhotite (ChRMpyr) and magnetite (ChRMmag), respectively. Mainly the ChRMpyr showed a consistent demagnetization behaviour, probably residing in pyrrhotite particles within the single domain to pseudo‐single domain range. Normal and reverse polarities were observed, partly co‐existing within the unblocking spectrum of single specimens; this (i) supports a thermoremanent (TRM) origin of the ChRMpyr and (ii) indicates that the time span of remanence acquisition was long enough to average out palaeosecular variation. The age of the ChRMpyr can be related to the last metamorphic cooling event at the Early to Late Miocene boundary (16 Ma). The ChRMmag is probably a secondary chemical or thermochemical remanence acquired by hydrothermal processes during retrogression. ChRMpyr and ChRMmag directions are similar suggesting that pyrrhotite and magnetite were magnetized approximately contemporaneously. Separation of the sampling area into three sectors reveals a south–north trend with (i) variable block rotations in the southernmost part close to the Main Central Thrust (five sites), (ii) no rotation in the area between Lukla and Namche (10 sites) and (iii) a significant clockwise rotation (N= 5 sites, D/I= 42.3°/29.4°, k= 20.7, α95= 17.2°) along the Imja Khola north of Namche. We interpret the clockwise rotation as an apparent rotation due to tilting by crustal doming in the Everest region. This doming obviously occurred north of a fault zone located at around Namche and was not affecting the region south of it. The clockwise sense of the apparent vertical‐axis rotation indicates that the area north of Namche is located at the western side of the dome str