Benefits of a simple glycaemic protocol in an orthopaedic surgery ward: a randomized prospective study

Background Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus are common in patients hospitalized in the orthopaedic surgery ward. However, glycaemic control obtained during hospitalization is often suboptimal. No method for achieving adequate glycaemic control in this population has been validated in an in‐hospi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2012-01, Vol.28 (1), p.71-75
Hauptverfasser: Schroeder, Josh E., Liebergall, M., Raz, I., Egleston, R., Ben Sussan, G., Peyser, A., Eldor, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus are common in patients hospitalized in the orthopaedic surgery ward. However, glycaemic control obtained during hospitalization is often suboptimal. No method for achieving adequate glycaemic control in this population has been validated in an in‐hospital setting. Intervention An intervention including an intensive subcutaneous insulin protocol in the orthopaedic department. Methods All diabetic patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery were prospectively randomized during a 6‐month period. One group (n = 30) received standard care with sliding scale insulin and the other group (n = 35) received the intervention protocol. During the intervention period, the staff was briefed on the importance of glucose monitoring and control. An intensive multiple‐injection protocol consisting of four daily regular/neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin injections was initiated in diabetic patients. The programme was followed up by a consulting diabetologist. Results Mean blood glucose levels throughout the hospitalization were 161.48 ± 3.8 mg/dL in the intervention group versus 175.29 ± 2.3 mg/dL in the control group (p < 0.0005). Hospitalization was shorter by 2 days in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The number of severe hyperglycaemic events (blood glucose level above 400 mg%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in the number of hypoglycaemic events. Conclusions The suggested four‐step intervention regimen improved glycaemic control of hospitalized patients in the orthopaedic department and simplified the ‘in‐house’ treatment of the diabetic patient. Hospital stays were reduced on average by two days (p < 0.05). Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1520-7552
1520-7560
DOI:10.1002/dmrr.1217